Over the last weekend, Iran conducted its first-ever direct and large-scale attack on Israel, launching over 300 missiles and drones. This marked a significant escalation in the longstanding shadow conflict between the two nations, traditionally characterized by indirect engagements through proxies. In response, Israel executed a direct yet symbolic retaliatory strike on April 19. The situation has heightened tensions in the Middle East, with experts and analysts discussing the potential implications and the future of this conflict.
.@nytimes' @ronenbergman and @PatrickKingsley on the design and rationale of Israel's April 19 retaliation against Iran: https://t.co/9Zoh6mrBSf
Iran’s attack last weekend was a watershed moment. Usually, Iran conducts its malign activities through proxies. This was the first time it conducted a direct and large-scale attack against Israel, columnist @matthewkroenig writes. https://t.co/clsKlsV167
Given the scale of Iran’s attack on Israel last weekend—a barrage of more than 300 missiles and drones—it was all but certain to face retaliation. What did Israel hope to gain by choosing direct yet symbolic action? https://t.co/2GJpdGfruH 👇
Iran and Israel have long been engaged in a shadow war, but the latest set of strikes and counterstrikes suggests a new phase in their struggle. @MaloneySuzanne and @ronenbergman discussed the ongoing situation on FP Live. Read the Q&A here: https://t.co/yrQhXnfHhm
Last weekend saw Iran’s first-ever direct attack on Israel. As the Middle East braces for the possibility of war, we host a roundtable to discuss Israel and Iran trading blows. https://t.co/FK6R36IbSR