This week, Supreme Court justices are facing cases that could impact access to courts and the delegation of Congress's powers. Legal experts and activists are advocating for changes, including age limits for elected officials and a ban on presidential self-pardons. The case SEC v. Jarkesy is seen as a potential turning point in protecting against the administrative state and restoring the originalist interpretation of the Seventh Amendment. Senate Democrats are accused of attempting to undermine the Supreme Court's authority.
Activist and writer Monica Lewinsky penned on op-ed calling for a series of constitutional amendments, including age limits for elected officials and a ban on presidential self-pardons https://t.co/uS09sxfftU https://t.co/ACS5WidZMA
Activist and writer Monica Lewinsky penned on op-ed calling for a series of constitutional amendments, including age limits for elected officials and a ban on presidential self-pardons https://t.co/8MGJIQmoGj https://t.co/QzNfogrqEw
Senate Democrats will do anything to undermine the Supreme Court in their attempt to assert control https://t.co/Jsepg1OLvl
“SEC v. Jarkesy could vindicate a legal protection against the administrative state that the Founders fought for…Restoring the originalist interpretation of the Seventh Amendment would strengthen safeguards against tyrannical government.” https://t.co/49HfB6qbn9
"The Supreme Court could itself, like Washington and Souter, deliver term limits as a professional norm, just as a matter of its own choice," @dsallentess writes. https://t.co/qEOwp1z72R
This Wednesday, Supreme Court justices could vindicate the constitutional right of access to courts and curtail Congress’s constitutionally dubious delegation of its powers, @GeorgeWill writes https://t.co/JEBZcV5UCX