Recent reports challenge the initial claims by Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) regarding the interception rate of Iran's missile attack. Initially reported to have intercepted 99% of the missiles, multiple sources including Maariv newspaper and satellite images now indicate that only about 84% were intercepted. The attack, described as unprecedented in scale, targeted multiple locations including three IDF air bases (Ramon, Nevatim, and another unnamed) and a nuclear reactor in Dimona, where at least one injury was reported. The use of mostly older missiles by IRGC and the discrepancy in reported interception rates raise questions about the effectiveness of Israel's air defense systems against such large-scale attacks.
The Maariv newspaper proves that the representative of the Zionist army lied: "Air defenses repelled about 84% of Iranian attacks, not 99% as an army spokesman said, and the Ramon and Nevatim bases were hit, as well as the Dimona reactor, aerial photographs show." https://t.co/2Lh87cFGYe
“Air defenses repelled about 84% of Iranian attacks, not 99% as the army spokesman said, and the Ramon and Nevatim bases were hit, as well as the reactor in Dimona,” as shown by aerial photographs " - Israeli Press
BREAKING: ISRAEL NOW SAY THEY REPELLED ONLY 84% OF IRAN’S MISSILE ATTACKS AND NOT 99% Insights from air defense analysts reveal a lower rate of attack interception than initially claimed by IDF officials, with an estimated repulsion rate of around 84% according to Israeli… https://t.co/rFpTZbTqIN
Maariv newspaper proves that the Zionist army spokesman was lying: “Air defenses repelled about 84% of Iranian attacks, not 99% as the army spokesman said, and the Ramon and Nevatim bases were hit, as well as the reactor in Dimona,” as shown by aerial photographs " https://t.co/cNlzLrb4Na
⚡ Maariv: “No truth to the IDF spokesman's claims”: this is the damage Iran's attack was able to cause in Israel • Air defenses repelled about 84% of the Iranian attack, not 99%, as the army spokesman said • Satellite images show at least one impact in one of the nuclear… https://t.co/1ww1oIFouN
🇮🇷⚔🇮🇱 The New York Times: All Israeli assessments did not anticipate the ferocity of the Iranian response, which actually occurred Maariv: Air defenses repelled about 84% of the Iranian attack, not 99%, as the army spokesman said - Satellite images show at least one injury in…
Israel | Maariv - Air defenses repelled about 84% of the Iranian attack, not 99% as the army spokesman said - Satellite images show at least one injury in one of the nuclear reactor buildings in Dimona and two in the surrounding area - Analysis of video clips at the Nevatim…
#Iran's missiles hit 3 IDF air bases not just Nevatim; Hebrew Daily's explosive reveal According to the report, the real interception rate may be significantly lower than initially stated. Watch for details https://t.co/AoXhvcynjY
NEW: As dust from #Iran's unprecedented attack on #Israel settles, its technical aspects remain unclear. Israel relishes high interception. But new footage indicates that IRGC deployed mostly older missiles. Will advanced gear be used if Israel responds? https://t.co/nLFwQCwlb3
Opinion: Despite claims Israel successfully intercepted 99pc of the roughly 350 missiles and drones launched, Iran's strike showed the difficulty of integrated air and missile defence against large-scale attack: https://t.co/p2JKNWIiE6 https://t.co/LRiQjQFZRw