Harvard University is under scrutiny for its response to multiple plagiarism incidents involving its president. Representative Tim Walberg criticized the university for applying different standards, implying that a student would not be given the benefit of the doubt under similar circumstances. Eliot A. Cohen, affiliated with @SAISHopkins and @CSIS, shared his insights on the issue in @TheAtlantic, stating, 'I have no idea how as a teacher at Harvard today I could look an undergraduate in the eye and hold forth about why plagiarism is a violation of the values inherent in the academic enterprise.' The Atlantic, identified as a liberal publication, has criticized Harvard for 'betrayed' its values by not holding its president accountable for the plagiarism.
Liberal Atlantic mag rips Harvard for president’s plagiarism "I have no idea how as a teacher at Harvard today I could look an undergraduate in the eye and hold forth about why plagiarism is a violation of the values inherent in the academic enterprise" https://t.co/M5sdy6fPb0
Liberal Atlantic mag rips Harvard for not holding President accountable on plagiarism: ‘Betrayed’ its values https://t.co/BN2irj8JYF
"I have no idea how as a teacher at Harvard today I could look an undergraduate in the eye and hold forth about why plagiarism is a violation of the values inherent in the academic enterprise," @EliotACohen writes: https://t.co/6JC37ymTVr
As it happens, I know something about plagiarism at Harvard. Some reflections on the present discontents there in @TheAtlantic @SAISHopkins @CSIS https://t.co/Q27GLD5bdo
If a student at Harvard had dozens of incidents of plagiarism, they would not be given the benefit of the doubt. Why does Harvard have a set of different standards for their president? https://t.co/vYoOmoFjsQ