Special Counsel Jack Smith's team has filed a court document opposing the live audio feed of Trump's DC election conspiracy criminal trial, arguing that District criminal courts should not allow it despite the practice in courts of appeals. Additionally, there are requests for communications records between Special Prosecutor Willis and White House officials, opposition to unsealing discovery materials in a classified docs case, and a battle over making redacted materials public, with Jack Smith opposing the move.
Jack Smith Opposes Unsealing of Discovery Material in Classified Docs Case Because One Document Confirms Existence of Another FBI Investigation via @gatewaypundit https://t.co/wtdzwOIR5k
Just the News Requested Communications Records Between Willis, Special Prosecutor, and White House Officials. @jsolomonReports https://t.co/Q6bU29QLXM
In new court filing, Special Counsel Jack Smith's team argues against court allowing live audio feed of Trump DC election conspiracy criminal trial Special Counsel says even though courts of appeals allow live feeds, District criminal court should not https://t.co/pbeSG9Yfx7
In new court filing, Special Counsel Jack Smith's team argues against court allowing live audio feed of Trump's DC election conspiracy criminal trial Special Counsel says even though courts of appeals allow live feeds, District criminal courts should not https://t.co/NRlVPqYFXc
Interesting battle brewing in classified docs case. (Remember that?) Press coalition wants discovery materials under seal via protective order to be unredacted and made public Trump's lawyers also asking Judge Cannon to allow most materials to be unsealed. Jack Smith opposes https://t.co/jK0CEKvUgk