Justice Clarence Thomas's participation in a case involving Donald Trump and the January 6 insurrection has sparked controversy due to his wife's alleged involvement. Critics argue that Thomas should have recused himself, citing ethical concerns and conflicts of interest.
This is a racist attack against Clarence Thomas https://t.co/SCBJJnENN0
God bless Justice Clarence Thomas! https://t.co/JlWP2wzPnb
Clarence Thomas is a great American.
Clarence Thomas should have recused himself from hearing the case that addresses whether Donald Trump should be allowed on the ballot. His wife, Ginni Thomas, was an active participant in attempting to overturn the 2020 election. He cannot be trusted to rule fairly on this case. https://t.co/8V3CqTdeaA
Clarence Thomas is a national treasure
Justice Clarence Thomas is a national treasure. https://t.co/qbvsOgld8T
Why is Clarence Thomas even participating in this case?
Clarence Thomas, with a direct conflict because his wife was neck deep in the insurrection, does not recuse himself. Most corrupt justice ever.
Having recused from a prior case related to Jan 6 due to his wife’s involvement, Justice Thomas’s participation in Trump’s ballot case is a shocking and intentional violation of his ethical obligations. Clarence Thomas is not above the law. This is a true crisis at the Court. https://t.co/kUM5gk0pP5
Justice Clarence Thomas is sitting on the bench today to hear a case involving Donald Trump and the 1/6 Insurrection. It is an ethical travesty of the highest order. We have not forgotten Ginni Thomas’ complicity in January 6th.