Loading...
A highly publicized COVID mask analysis has come under scrutiny after it was found to have flaws. The analysis, highlighted by Scientific American, has been criticized for sacrificing scientific objectivity. The publication's stance on masks has been questioned, with some suggesting that it goes against empirical evidence. The controversy has sparked a debate about the effectiveness of masks in preventing the spread of COVID-19.
A Scientific American article makes clear how willing mask advocates are to sacrifice scientific objectivity on the altar of their newfound religion. https://t.co/0UQbf5ORfY via Jeffrey H. Anderson
Wonder why all of a sudden they are going mask-off, regardless of being on the "left" or the "right"? *** I've checked what has become accomplished thus far, and highlighted where we are now. *** The Painter explains: https://t.co/UFu74y1l5o
What would make a publication with a name like "Scientific American" set empirical evidence at odds with reality? Covid-19 and masks, of course. https://t.co/0UQbf5ORfY via Jeffrey H. Anderson
What went wrong with a highly publicized COVID mask analysis? https://t.co/2oLJQJtSDo
Masks Work. So What Went Wrong with a Highly Publicized COVID Mask Analysis? https://t.co/pvOUgL66wZ