Andrew Huberman, a figure in the podcast and science community, has been the subject of controversy following a New York Magazine piece focusing on his personal life rather than his scientific credibility. Despite criticism, Huberman has not directly addressed the article but continues to gain attention through interviews and videos on social media. Various opinions on his character and work have emerged, with some defending him as a data-driven individual while others dismiss him as a fitness personality. The impact of the NYMag article on Huberman's reputation remains uncertain.
Andrew Huberman takes the RED PILL! https://t.co/YIGwPLbiJy
Seems like Huberman is completely ignoring the NY Mag hit piece. Which is smart. https://t.co/jKvUh3hxAj
NYMag published their hit piece on Andrew Huberman five days ago. Since then, heโs released a 2:51 interview and several short videos on Twitter, garnering tens of millions of views. He hasnโt addressed the article. A week from now, no one will remember it. Take notes, people. https://t.co/LdZnzzuQ5t
My opinion of Huberman was that he was some fit podcast guy who understands dopamine and probably gets a lot of women. Until Forbes wrote an article explaining that that was correct. https://t.co/CAucJ9lIa3
.@charliekirk11 calls a hit piece against Andrew Huberman "a hit job straight from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson." @JackPosobiec says "I think he's just a guy who follows the data." https://t.co/gKzOVM1OGJ
I noticed ppl disregarding the NYMag piece bc it focused on Hubermanโs personal life, not bad science & harmful misinformation he propagates. So I wrote a thing. @slate: โSo, Should You Trust Andrew Huberman?โ https://t.co/Yp7kiLJvax