Various individuals and organizations, including ceidotorg, GaryShapiro, and NRO, are expressing concerns over the potential repeal or replacement of Section 230, a law that provides legal protections for online platforms. They argue that removing Section 230 could harm online communities, hinder free speech, and lead to a decrease in permissible online content. Congressional hearings and discussions are underway regarding the proposed legislation.
WATCH LIVE: Subcommittee hearing on a bipartisan proposal to sunset Section 230 ⬇️
Sunsetting #Section230 would remove #freespeech protections online and hinder digital platforms that millions of Americans rely on. We urge Congress to reject this ill-conceived proposal. #Save230 https://t.co/LvZaZewgOl[…]-to-sunset-section-230-of-the-communications-decency-act https://t.co/PYNUUcvGwG
Without Section 230, the fear of litigation would most immediately trigger a large decrease in material allowed online. | @melugin_p https://t.co/qFEthFGQtf
Tune in @ 10 AM: I’m Chairing @HouseCommerce’s Communications & Technology Subcommittee to discuss legislation to sunset Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. https://t.co/ZDDoVnkxTc
Sunsetting #Section230 would remove #freespeech protections online and hinder digital platforms that millions of Americans rely on. We urge Congress to reject this ill-conceived proposal. #Save230 https://t.co/CoLWH4SNOL https://t.co/93l3EZX12O
While many associate Section 230 with aiding large social media platforms, other players in the online community will be harmed in its absence. We urge members to resist this attempt to repeal or replace Section 230. @melugin_p @VanceGinn @taxreformer https://t.co/fvXlnayp4t