During a game, Jaylen Brown's action of hitting TJ McConnell in the face led to debates among fans and analysts, with many calling for a flagrant foul to be assessed. The incident caused McConnell serious pain, and observers expressed surprise that it was not immediately deemed a flagrant. Various commentators highlighted the impact on McConnell and the need for the play to be reviewed for a potential flagrant foul.
I’m stunned that wasn’t a flagrant in Brown. Direct shot to the face. Even if unintentional come on
How was this not a flagrant??? https://t.co/DYeg0FjxhI
Flagrant Foul? https://t.co/y4WUtHTNOt
How is that not a flagrant foul? It's not intentional but WTF https://t.co/rfmM1Nu8vZ
Has to be a flagrant, even if Jaylen Brown did not intend to hit McConnell in the face.
If that's not a flagrant one, what is?
Why should it matter that he “was trying to go after the ball.” Brown whacked McConnell in the face. That’s a flagrant foul.
That's a clear flagrant. Brown hits McConnell in the face. That's at least an F1
That's a clear flagrant. Brown hits McConnell in the face. That's at least a F1
TJ McConnell is in serious pain after Jaylen Brown grabbed him in the air and McConnell slammed his face into the floor. Mazzulla is angry there is a review for a flagrant after there wasn't one when Jackson kicked Pritchard in the face earlier.
That’s a flagrant on Brown
That should be looked at as a flagrant foul