Criticism towards The New York Times has intensified, with accusations of moral collapse and bias in its editorial choices. Critics, including public figures and social media users, have expressed concerns over the newspaper's decision to feature a symposium article on 1948, which included three Arab nationalists, one Jew, and two anti-Zionists with claimed Jewish antecedents. This selection has been interpreted by some as a sign of the Times' alleged descent into 'rules of the game' level decadence and moral collapse, with questions raised about the editor being a "sworn member of Hamas?" Accusations of the paper reaching new lows and potentially aiding and abetting genocide through its editorial decisions have been made, with a statement that there is "no bottom to the abyss" at the editors' desks at The New York Times.
As I was saying - there is no bottom to the abyss at the editors desks at NY times - rock bottom https://t.co/lP76MdSYwR
is there a depth to which the new york times will not sink? because from where i’m sitting we should be charging its writers and editors for aiding and abetting genocide https://t.co/Bu46QPzLd1
The New York Times seems to be trying to reach new lows every day. https://t.co/B5dMHgY4iP
I know this is a heavy statement - but this is the lowest I’ve ever seen the New York Times sink into “ rules of the game “ level decadence and moral collapse https://t.co/brYbzNVG6o
What is wrong with the New York Times ? Is the editor a sworn member of Hamas ? Who else would organize a symposium article for the magazine on 1948 with 3 Arab nationalists, 1 Jew and 2 deservedly obscure anti-Zionists who claim Jewish antecedents to get a pass for their hatred
There is something really wrong with the NYT https://t.co/ktzxNYhyzo