UK former Attorney General Suella Braverman expressed skepticism about the World Health Organisation's ability to manage a global pandemic and emphasized that no pandemic treaty is better than a bad one. She highlighted concerns about potential loss of sovereignty and adverse effects on Britain's interests. Various voices, including British MP Suella Braverman and academic Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, have called for caution and a bipartisan review before signing the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, citing concerns over the organization's past Covid management policies.
We should press pause on WHO's Pandemic Treaty w/ @DrJBhattacharya "Validating this treaty is a vote for the disastrous policies of the Covid years. USA [& UK] should avoid signing until a bipartisan review of WHO’s Covid management is accomplished" https://t.co/4deVF9bQM4
Question. Have you heard about the WHO pandemic treaty and do you know what is actually in the document? Let me tell you - It's worse than you think. If the WHO declares a pandemic, then the Bill Gates backed organization can "recommend" countries to do the following.…
"Under no circumstances must we surrender our sovereignty... No pandemic treaty is better than a bad pandemic treaty." British MP Suella Braverman on the WHO Pandemic Agreement: "I am profoundly sceptical of the WHO's ability to manage a global pandemic, in light of serious… https://t.co/i7TzNFZnod
We cannot sign a Treaty with the @WHO World Health Organisation that forces us into Lockdown, or compels us into action that may not be in Britain’s interests. No Pandemic Treaty is better than a bad Pandemic Treaty https://t.co/4ewYbuk2DC
"No pandemic treaty is better than a bad pandemic treaty". UK former Attorney General @SuellaBraverman bang on the money in yesterday's parliamentary debate on the @WHO Pandemic Accords. "I am profoundly sceptical about the World Health Organisation’s ability to manage a… https://t.co/KdaO4pznDI