Market Brief
Daily market recaps with key events, stock movements, and global influences
Republican members of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee mounted an aggressive line of questioning against Minnesota Governor Tim Walz during a two-day hearing on 12-13 June that examined state and local "sanctuary" policies toward undocumented immigrants. Walz, one of three Democratic governors called to testify, was repeatedly pressed on Minnesota’s limits on cooperation with federal immigration authorities and on remarks he made in 2018 comparing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to the Gestapo. Minnesota Representative Tom Emmer led the critique, accusing Walz of failing to maintain public safety during the 2020 Minneapolis riots and declaring, "You are an utter failure—you should not be governor." Representatives Nancy Mace, Eric Burlison and Pete Stauber followed with questions about crime, border security and the governor’s past support for protests seeking to abolish ICE. Walz declined to retract his Gestapo comparison despite multiple prompts from Burlison, and sparred with Mace over broader questions related to gender and school safety. Democrats on the committee defended the governor. Ohio Representative Shontel Brown argued that Republican criticisms would be better directed at passing universal background-check legislation and restoring funding for community-violence prevention programs. She also faulted the majority for pardoning some participants in the 6 January 2021 Capitol riot while, in her view, under-investing in social services such as Medicaid and SNAP. The hearing underscored the deep partisan divide over immigration enforcement ahead of the summer legislative session. While Republicans signaled that they will continue to target state sanctuary policies, Walz maintained that Minnesota’s approach balances public safety with protections for immigrant communities and said any federal reforms must come through comprehensive immigration legislation, not what he called "political theatrics."
OptionProbability
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
97
96
96
94
94
92
90
90
89
89
89
89
88
88
85
84
84
84
83
83
83
82
82
82
82
80
79
78
77
74
72
71
71
70
70
70
70
70
68
68
66
66
66
64
63
63
62
62
61
61
60
60
59
58
57
57
57
56
55
55
54
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
48
46
46
46
42
42
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
38
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
36
34
34
34
33
32
31
31
30
30
29
28
27
27
27
26
26
25
25
25
25
25
24
22
21
21
20
18
17
17
17
17
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
14
14
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
12
12
12
12
12
12
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
9
9
9
8
8
8
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
0
OptionProbability
21
20
12
10
7
6
6
6
6
6
3
OptionVotes
221
183
OptionVotes
151
66
OptionVotes
369
258