Negotiations on a Ukraine-border deal have gained support from various sources, including the Wall Street Journal and congressional members. The deal is seen as beneficial for Ukraine and the US, with potential funding from immobilized Russian assets. G7 officials have intensified talks on spending some assets to fund Ukraine, a move that could push Russia into a financial crisis and potentially end the war.
Good: “G7 officials have intensified talks in recent weeks on spending some of the roughly $300bn in immobilised Russian sovereign assets, a radical step that would open a new chapter in the west’s financial warfare against Moscow.” https://t.co/ViKRS3lLlN
Russia's central bank policy rate has gone above Ukraine for the first time since early 2022. The West has the power to push Russia into deep financial crisis that may end the war. A lower G7 cap would cause sharp Ruble devaluation, hyperinflation and financial crisis in Russia. https://t.co/lyq42xoIb3
We need to provide funding for Ukraine as soon as possible and the President has the power to do it. The administration can allocate frozen Russian assets to Ukraine. It is consistent with international law, and can be done immediately. So let’s do it.
G7 moves closer to seizing Russian state assets for Ukraine. It’s such an obvious and morally correct move. There’s no reason why Putin shouldn’t fund Ukraine’s defence against his invasion https://t.co/Kf0Gcg98oN
G7 officials have intensified talks in recent weeks on spending some of the roughly $300bn in immobilised Russian sovereign assets, a radical step that would open a new chapter in the west’s financial warfare against Moscow. https://t.co/p5Ck4dvc6r
Exclusive: Western nations have intensified talks in recent weeks on spending some of the roughly $300bn in immobilised Russian sovereign assets to fund Ukraine, a radical step that would open a new chapter in the west’s financial warfare against Moscow https://t.co/PUKq4OPncc https://t.co/s0oRYlRqte
From @WSJopinion: A Ukraine-border deal would be good for the country and a tonic for America’s polarized politics https://t.co/Xhiu7fUSHJ
A compromise on the border, @MarcThiessen writes, would be good for Biden (and for Ukraine) https://t.co/eky8w5PbIa
A) Schumer: Over the last few days, negotiations on a path forward to getting national security supplemental done have made good progress. As I've said, if we believe something is important and urgent, we should stay and get the job done.
The reasons for continued congressional support for Ukraine are threefold: The border dispute will be resolved, it's a good return on investment, and it's in America's interest. https://t.co/lb13DF90vE
It's about 257 years since I agreed with a WSJ editorial, but this one is on the money. A Ukraine-border deal would be good for the country and a tonic for America’s polarized politics. https://t.co/ZvsFhcTL80 via @WSJopinion