A Seattle federal judge has dismissed a proposed consumer class action against Amazon that accused the e-commerce giant of failing to meet its 'guaranteed' delivery for some purchases. US District Judge Kymberly Evanson in Seattle ruled that the customer had not shown how Amazon’s delivery practices violated Washington’s consumer protection law. In a separate case, a US appeals court has overturned a judge's order that required Amazon to refrain from firing union supporters amid a nationwide organizing campaign at its warehouses. The Second Circuit vacated the order, stating the judge did not explain why such a broad prohibition was necessary.
Breaking News: The Supreme Court sided with Starbucks in a case over whether regulators can intervene when a company is accused of suppressing labor organizing, in a blow to the National Labor Relations Board. https://t.co/IDd5k6EYdA
Supreme Court, siding with Starbucks, makes it harder for NLRB to win court orders in labor disputes https://t.co/bGNnQKRgP7
US supreme court sides with Starbucks in union case over fired employees https://t.co/Y7XfzKJuDN
The Supreme Court has made it harder for the federal government to win court orders when it suspects a company of interfering in unionization campaigns. The case stemmed from a labor dispute with Starbucks. https://t.co/383eOPuj18
“The US Supreme Court sided with Starbucks Corp. over the National Labor Relations Board in a decision that will make it more difficult for the agency to win temporary reinstatement of workers fired during labor disputes.” https://t.co/CSpBaI7ZlH @robertiafolla
Supreme Court, siding with Starbucks, makes it harder for NLRB to win court orders in labor disputes | Click on the image to read the full story https://t.co/obCjjJiteb
Supreme Court backs Starbucks over Biden labor board in 'Memphis 7' union case https://t.co/O7T3Qena61
BREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court made it tougher for the NLRB to win injunctions against employers in a case involving Starbucks, directing courts to strictly apply a four-factor test when the board sues to stem alleged unfair labor practices. https://t.co/gMkoFcWr8T https://t.co/2RMrKzuw4V
🚨🇺🇸SUPREME COURT SIDES WITH STARBUCKS IN UNION FIGHT SCOTUS has made a new rule that makes it harder for workers to start a union. This all started when Starbucks fired 7 workers who wanted to form a union at their Tennessee store in 2022. A judge told Starbucks to give those… https://t.co/U13ly53JZA
The Supreme Court tossed a lower court’s ruling ordering Starbucks to reinstate seven Memphis-based employees terminated amid a unionization drive. https://t.co/MZN26FZ6Zg
The US Supreme Court sided with Starbucks over the National Labor Relations Board in a decision that will make it more difficult for the agency to win temporary reinstatement of workers fired during labor disputes. https://t.co/r2mFxNrrB5
The US Supreme Court sided with Starbucks in its challenge to a judicial order to rehire seven Memphis employees fired as they sought to unionize in a ruling that could make it harder for courts to quickly halt labor practices contested as unfair under federal law…
SCOTUS sided with Starbucks in its challenge to a judicial order to rehire seven Memphis employees fired as they sought to unionize in a ruling that could make it harder for courts to quickly halt labor practices contested as unfair under federal law https://t.co/SvykF4PYYa https://t.co/d824s4CUmE
BREAKING: The Supreme Court sided with Starbucks in a decision that could make it harder for labor prosecutors to win court injunctions against employers they believe to have broken the law. https://t.co/APSvplSYuQ
US Supreme Court backs Starbucks over fired pro-union workers https://t.co/4UNQX7LRZL https://t.co/I1K1ecbZrF
🔵 US SUPREME COURT BACKS STARBUCKS OVER FIRED PRO-UNION WORKERS The U.S. Supreme Court sided on Thursday with Starbucks in the coffee chain's challenge to a judicial order to rehire seven Memphis employees fired as they sought to unionize in a ruling that could make it harder… https://t.co/T0LfyUEtDZ
Supreme Court curbs the National Labor Relations Board's power in win for Starbucks https://t.co/8cEK9kVMjP
Third and final decision of the day is Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, a mostly unanimous ruling by Thomas (w partial dissent from Justice Jackson) on a labor-relations dispute https://t.co/49lOzbR57j
FINAL SUPREME COURT: Starbucks v. McKinney. Thomas for an 8-1 Court. Jackson concurring in part, dissenting in part. When considering the NLRB’s request for a preliminary injunction under §10( j), district courts must apply the traditional four factors. https://t.co/JNUle6TgJN
⚠️ U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES IN FAVOR OF STARBUCKS IN CASE INVOLVING FIRED MEMPHIS WORKERS WHO SOUGHT TO JOIN UNION
The Supreme Court's third AND FINAL decision is Starbucks v. NLRB. Justice Thomas' opinion for the court is an 8–1 defeat for labor that will make it harder to halt allegedly unfair labor practices. Only KBJ dissents. https://t.co/OKWxnMcRRS
Third and last #SCOTUS ruling is in the Starbucks labor injunction case. Justice Thomas writes for 8-1(ish) majority in siding with Starbucks that the traditional equitable standard applies: https://t.co/m9WdHOhEiF Nothing else coming today.
NEW: We have a decision in Starbucks v. McKinney by Thomas. It's unanimous, but with Justice Jackson concurring and dissenting in part but concurring in the judgement. https://t.co/MqDOfnxZbX
The 2nd Circuit said a judge who ordered Amazon to refrain from firing union supporters amid a nationwide organizing campaign at its warehouses last year at the request of the NLRB failed to explain why such a sweeping mandate was necessary https://t.co/4iQKu0AyYj https://t.co/eSXhwBbz8I
Judge Abused Discretion With Order Against Amazon After Worker's Firing, 2nd Circuit Says https://t.co/F1F3TOCKhb
A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday tossed out a judge's order that required https://t.co/zovy4IIvPs to refrain from firing union supporters amid a nationwide organizing campaign at its warehouses. https://t.co/s1jMGHJtJj
The Second Circuit vacated an order barring Amazon from firing workers for engaging in union activity, saying the judge did not explain why she imposed the broad prohibition while finding the company did not have to rehire a fired union activist. https://t.co/PXCZWauIiK https://t.co/gT8WaVRiU5
Appeals Court Throws Out Order Barring Amazon From Firing Pro-Union Employees https://t.co/g7NuCqWx4M https://t.co/Pu70eqLDLC
Amazon escaped a federal judge’s order mandating that the e-commerce giant comply with federal labor law in connection with allegations that it illegally fired a worker for his organizing activities at the company’s Staten Island warehouse. https://t.co/pHzRJgY4Pi
US court nixes order barring Amazon from firing pro-union workers https://t.co/CpMCqZRF3M https://t.co/7Qq3WekgoI
A US appeals court tossed out a judge's order that required Amazon to refrain from firing union supporters amid a nationwide organizing campaign at its warehouses https://t.co/MQTfmku7hs @DanWiessner https://t.co/ndeMcoSvSR
🔵 US COURT NIXES ORDER BARRING AMAZON FROM FIRING PRO-UNION WORKERS Full Story → https://t.co/ojbFvEkFRh A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday tossed out a judge's order that required https://t.co/mn1yyfCkP0 to refrain from firing union supporters amid a nationwide organizing… https://t.co/gO2tHCqUeB
US District Judge Kymberly Evanson in Seattle dismissed a proposed consumer class action against Amazon that accused the e-commerce giant of failing to meet its stated ‘guaranteed’ delivery for some purchases. Subscribe to The Daily Docket: https://t.co/s1z0JFig0G https://t.co/P975i8gDXU
A Seattle federal judge dismissed a proposed class action that accused Amazon of failing to meet its 'guaranteed' delivery for some purchases, saying the customer had not shown how Amazon’s delivery practices violated Washington’s consumer protection law https://t.co/3ZQC5RvcXp https://t.co/hFe1PBdxF7
Amazon has persuaded a Seattle federal judge to dismiss a proposed consumer class action that accused the ecommerce giant of failing to meet its stated "guaranteed" delivery for some purchases @MikeScarcella https://t.co/3ZQC5RvcXp https://t.co/fT3xddG0Dc
A federal judge ruled on June 7 that she would dismiss a proposed consumer class action that accused Amazon of failing to meet its stated 'guaranteed' delivery for some purchases for now, but would allow the customer to file an amended lawsuit by July 8 https://t.co/hnyd643CGF https://t.co/ibNBlK7CiE
Amazon fends off US class action over 'guaranteed' delivery window https://t.co/ej9cPKd4k6 https://t.co/IhXrQIRByL
Amazon has persuaded a Seattle federal judge to dismiss a proposed consumer class action that accused the ecommerce giant of failing to meet its stated 'guaranteed' delivery for some purchases https://t.co/3ZQC5RvcXp @MikeScarcella https://t.co/HU4gFvmVPc