Several NCAA athletes are at the center of discussions regarding compensation and benefits. An athlete accused of rape sought to play in March Madness, highlighting the intersection of legal issues and player compensation. Stanford athletes are also exploring avenues to receive payment for competing. Canadian NCAA players are facing challenges in receiving their fair share of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) profits, impacting future Canadian players.
Here’s that NCAA commercial about guaranteed scholarships, healthcare, and other athlete benefits being played on the jumbotron at Barclays Center. (As many have pointed out, these enhanced benefits are mostly from legal pressure, not NCAA altruism)
An NCAA player accused of rape sued to be allowed to play in March Madness. @StepCarter explains how his case hinged on something new for college players: money https://t.co/i7YwJ0NGfP via @opinion
As Zach Edey's Purdue and Aaliyah Edwards' UConn begin their March Madness tournaments today, I wrote about how Canadian NCAA players aren't getting their fair share of the NIL pie. And what that means for other Canadian players coming up the pipeline: https://t.co/lCnWcfYNmE
An NCAA player accused of rape sued to be allowed to play in March Madness. @StepCarter explains how his case hinged on something new for college players: money https://t.co/ENlIoBKqiO
An NCAA athlete accused of rape sued to be allowed to play in March Madness. @StepCarter explains how his case hinged on something new for college players: money https://t.co/y7jDfMIAZ7 via @opinion
From @Marisa_Ingemi Could Stanford athletes follow Dartmouth on path to getting paid to compete? https://t.co/VuR9YTPq0Z via @sfchronicle