Legal analysts and commentators are discussing the uncertainty surrounding what the alleged 'second crime' by Trump will be in the Bragg case. There are concerns about the lack of direct evidence presented by Bragg in the Trump trial, with suggestions that the case may be politically motivated and lacking in substantial proof of fraud. Public opinion seems unmoved by the trial, which hinges on an alleged crime committed in service of another unspecified crime.
As @AndrewCMcCarthy & @JonathanTurley have been pointing out, Bragg’s case (rejected by his predecessor & the feds) relies on an alleged, dubious ‘crime’ committed in service of another *unspecified* crime. This may explain why public opinion hasn’t really budged amid the trial. https://t.co/eMOrsQPUk7
'Hard To Prove': MSNBC Panel 'Concerned' Bragg Still Hasn't Presented 'Direct Evidence' In Trump Trial https://t.co/VBDHRvoy25
‘Strange situation’: MSNBC legal analyst says it’s still uncertain what Trump’s ‘second crime’ will be in Bragg case https://t.co/TaUwaldnCT
Andy McCarthy: “Bragg knows what he is doing is improper, completely political case. Maybe Merchan is having second thoughts…They haven't come close to proving that fraud has taken place, and they don't just have to prove that fraud has taken place, they have to prove that it…
‘Strange Situation’: MSNBC Legal Analyst Says It’s Still Uncertain What Trump’s ‘Second Crime’ Will Be In Bragg Case https://t.co/KHLR9opGi8