A group of 11 far-left lawyers in Alabama, representing transgender plaintiffs in cases against a law banning child sex changes, faces allegations of unethical conduct known as "judge shopping." This practice involves repeatedly dropping and refiling cases to secure a favorable judge. The controversy has sparked a legal and ethical inquiry, with the court stating it may consider one or more of several possible sanctions, including suspension from practice, censure, reprimands, or disqualification in the Northern and Middle Districts of Alabama.
Lawyers accused of "judge shopping" in Alabama when bringing cases against law banning child sex changes https://t.co/fFlEPS8HTl https://t.co/fFlEPS8HTl
Leftist lawyers face ethical misconduct inquiry: "the Court may consider one or more of several possible sanctions, as appropriate, including suspension from practice in the Northern and Middle Districts of Alabama; censure; public or private reprimand; disqualification;…
Lawyers accused of "judge shopping" in Alabama when bringing cases against law banning child sex changes https://t.co/PZXHmvqKCW https://t.co/PZXHmvqKCW
11 far-left attorneys in AL trying to stop a ban on medical transitioning of children have to answer for why they engaged in the sanctionable practice of "judge shopping." The lawyers repeatedly dropped & refiled their cases to try to get a leftist judge. https://t.co/z9Iw8UMaxt
Lawyers representing transgender plaintiffs face possible sanctions for alleged "judge shopping." https://t.co/CNPweIigUJ #ethics #legalethics #LGBTQ