Professor Bill McGuire, a climate scientist, recently attracted controversy by posting and then deleting a tweet that advocated for reducing the human population to lower carbon emissions, suggesting measures akin to a 'genocide via pandemic'. This action has sparked a backlash, with critics accusing McGuire of promoting extreme Malthusian views. McGuire later clarified that his tweet was misunderstood, rather than expressing regret over the sentiment. The incident has ignited discussions around the ethical boundaries of climate change advocacy.
Crackpot climate scientist /doomer has thoughts about population control: cheerleading a deadly pandemic to wipe out billions of people. Bill McGuire has an acute case of brain worms. https://t.co/vNxA9m4SD6
It was inevitable that the #ClimateScam would become the excuse for genocide, just as American academics promoted eugenics - the excuse for The Holocaust. @ProfBillMcGuire https://t.co/4ru8jKXES5
.@ProfBillMcGuire posts then deletes tweet calling for culling the human population to reduce carbon emissions. Not because he regrets the tweet, but because we are taking his Malthusian musings the wrong way. cc @foxnews @nypost https://t.co/2yV5N366d2
.@ProfBillMcGuire posts then deletes tweet calling for culling the human population to reduce carbon emissions. Not because he regrets the tweet, but because we are taking his Malthusian musings the wrong way. cc @foxnews @ https://t.co/8Z4TUzSODD
The environmental movement has reached the point of openly advocating for "genocide via pandemic." Remember, these are the people the media tells you are "following the science" and are the voices of reason. At best, they want to impoverish you and at worst, kill you. https://t.co/V3sefXwVft