The defamation trial involving climate scientist Michael Mann and defendants, including Mark Steyn, is ongoing. Mann is suing for libel over claims about his 'hockey stick' graph. Testimonies from experts, including statistician Abraham Wyner and MIT's Dick Lindzen, have alleged data manipulation and misleading graphs. The trial continues with intense scrutiny and implications for free speech and climate science debates.
Slight change of schedule this morning in @MichaelEMann v Free Speech. MIT's Dick Lindzen will be the first witness. Statistician Abraham Wyner will retake the stand after Lindzen. https://t.co/TFWLSY6Kse
The trial of @MichaelEMann v. Free Speech resumes this morning with all-star statistician Abraham Wyner on the stand. Watch live: https://t.co/1rHY6e1Wmp https://t.co/KVltcZw8qT
The shattering of the climate hoax's "hockey stick": Wharton statistician Dr. Abraham Wyner testified under oath today in @MichaelEMann v. Free Speech that Mann's "hockey stick" graphs were produced by "manipulating" data in a "misleading" manner. Below are the hockey stick… https://t.co/6w50tAMAy1
Ironically, @MichaelEMann has succeeded in putting his hokey stick on trial in Mann v Free Speech. Murders Row testimony coming from climate realist all-stars Steve McIntyre, Ross McKitrick, Judith Curry & Dick Lindzen. Whatever the jury ultimately thinks of his defamation case… https://t.co/ZPdeYqFURP
Breaking... well-known statistician testifies in @MichaelEMann v. Free Speech that Mann's hockey stick papers 'manipulated' data in a 'misleading' way. Trial continuing while parties prepare memos and judge mulls over whether it should anymore.
BREAKING NEWS: Michael Mann defamation case against @MarkSteynOnline & Simberg close to collapse after Mann's lawyers neglected to enter alleged defamatory articles into the court as evidence. Mann looking anxiously as lawyers.
Dishonest #climate activist @MichaelEMann is abusing the legal system to try to silence opponents & put them out of business. “The beauty of ‘bringing down’ National Review or any of the other defendants is that Mr. Mann doesn’t have to prevail to do it; he just has to keep the…
Dishonest climate activist @MichaelEMann is abusing the legal system to try to silence opponents & put them out of business. "The beauty of 'bringing down' National Review or any of the other defendants is that Mr. Mann doesn’t have to prevail to do it; he just has to keep the…
In the widely-billed climate trial of the century, the fake Nobel laureate Michael Mann is suing Mark Steyn for libel for saying his infamous 'hockey stick' graph is fraudulent. https://t.co/2eBd00hx4c
From @WSJopinion: Anthony Fauci isn’t the only oracle of science who regards dissent from his findings as heresy. Meet Michael Mann, writes @wjmcgurn. https://t.co/3nk4qSkfD9
"At Mann’s Defamation Trial, Defendants Are Doubling Down on Climate Denial" by @AMLowenstein for @DeSmog: https://t.co/WnqlJChTRl
"At Mann’s Defamation Trial, Defendants Are Doubling Down on Climate Denial" by @AdamLowenstein for @DeSmog: https://t.co/WnqlJChTRl
Come on, you can't have this guy testifying as an expert witness (grants, peer review, climate science) at the Mann vs. Steyn climate trial. Professor John Abraham has/had an affiliation with the "Climate Science Legal Defense Fund" which has paid for Mann's legal fees in past…
"With both Dr. Fauci and Mr. Mann, the real issue is not so much that they got things wrong but that they tried to suppress the robust debate that is necessary for scientific truth." https://t.co/KXiDlgMVQj