A group of climate experts, including meteorologist Anthony Watts, has raised concerns about the validity of temperature data used to guide climate change spending. They claim that a significant percentage of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) temperature monitoring stations are improperly located in urban heat islands, which could lead to biased temperature readings. Watts found that 96 percent of NOAA's stations have a heat bias due to their proximity to heat sources such as exhaust fans or hot rooftops, suggesting that the trillions of dollars spent on climate change initiatives are based on potentially faulty data.
“A growing chorus of climate scientists are saying the temperature readings are faulty and that the trillions of dollars pouring in are based on a problem that doesn’t exist. More than 90 percent of NOAA’s temperature monitoring stations have a heat bias, according to Anthony… https://t.co/BkpAP7ZDK1
Trillions Spent on ‘Climate Change’ Based on Faulty Temperature Data, Climate Experts Say https://t.co/sypLxP2djX #ClimateChange
Trillions Spent on ‘Climate Change’ Based on Faulty Temperature Data, Climate Experts Say Meteorologist finds 96 percent of NOAA temperature stations located in ‘urban heat islands,’ including next to exhaust fans and on ‘blistering-hot rooftops.’ https://t.co/1O4YVWvvuX
WINNING - Trillions Spent on ‘Climate Change’ Based on Faulty Temperature Data https://t.co/R3GFzE9Z0a
Trillions in taxpayer money flushed down the toilet for the climate hoax. 👇 https://t.co/Mj87o7kx6C