World Health Organization (WHO) member states are currently negotiating a significant pandemic agreement, known as the Pandemic Accords. This treaty aims to establish global protocols for managing future pandemics, granting the WHO substantial control over pandemic responses. Critics, including the campaign group UsForThem and Molly Kingsley, argue that despite revisions to earlier drafts, the treaty still represents an overreach of authority. Concerns have been raised about the potential for the WHO to enforce lockdowns and other stringent measures without the consent of elected governments. Dr. Bhattacharya has likened the treaty to 'Fauciism on Global Steroids' due to its significant implications for global health governance. The final vote on the accord by 194 member states is scheduled for May 2024, to be conducted behind closed doors.
Dr. Bhattacharya: Here's Why the WHO Treaty Is Fauciism on Global Steroids The WHO's funding ask is outrageous enough, but the power grab is much more dangerous and insidious. https://t.co/hsDUqfXN9z
🚨🌎 World Health Organisation - Pandemic Accord “In May 2024 194 Member States will have their final vote on The WHO Pandemic Accord - behind closed doors” “It is not reported or discussed by our newspapers or in our parliaments” They don’t ask you because they know you… https://t.co/iUAx7ObeaF
The WHO is a disgrace. This undemocratic, authoritarian organisation wants to force member states to use lockdowns, mask mandates and censorship to fight future pandemics – despite all the terrible harm this did during Covid. It must be stopped: https://t.co/gbjuEpnnJ9
"In light of the well-documented mis-steps and overreach of the WHO since 2020, critical thinkers must now question whether the Pandemic Treaty and IHRs remain an appropriate framework, and whether the WHO in its current form, with its current funding arrangements, remains an… https://t.co/KWGQ1x22vQ
Why does the WHO want to dictate the UK’s public-health policy? Its new pandemic treaty would give unelected officials the power to impose lockdowns over the heads of elected governments. We must reject this recipe for tyranny, says Molly Kingsley https://t.co/gbjuEpnnJ9
Despite a retreat from the egregious overreach seen in earlier drafts, the WHO's proposed Pandemic Accords will still give the WHO control over how future pandemics are managed, warns campaign group UsForThem. https://t.co/6DKobRkBzb
Despite a retreat from the egregious overreach seen in earlier drafts, campaign group UsForThem delivers a stark warning over the WHO's proposed Pandemic Accords and push for global pandemic control. https://t.co/iieqxubj1i
"As we navigate the uncertain waters of a post-pandemic world, where new economic, social, and political landscapes are forming, World Health Organization (WHO) member states are negotiating a crucial pandemic agreement." Read more: https://t.co/mOc4CtyoEs https://t.co/qfvPoKhOmw
WHO Pandemic Treaty/IHR: Will Even ONE Senator Call Their Bluff? Treaties have to be ratified by the Senate. Yet it has now become common practice for treaties like the "Paris Climate Accord" to be "self-ratified" as Kerry said he and Obama did. More than enough Senators… https://t.co/v4kXQSk1aC