Recent developments in the AI sector highlight significant advancements and competition among large language models (LLMs), particularly focusing on OpenAI's GPT-4 and Anthropic's Claude 3 Opus. A Princeton University paper revealed that Claude 3 Opus excels in long-context text summarization, nearly doubling the performance of its closest competitor, GPT-4 Turbo, in terms of faithfulness. Users and developers have noted Claude 3 Opus's superior ability in handling tasks without detailed specifications, outperforming closed-source LLMs and marking a historic achievement in AI. Cohere's Command R+ also emerged as a strong contender, achieving the status of the best open model on the leaderboard, as recognized by over 13,000 human votes. The model has been praised for its performance in reasoning, code generation, and cost-effectiveness, with Claude Haiku being highlighted as the most economical option. These developments underscore a dynamic shift in the AI landscape, with open models gaining ground against established players.
Congratulations to @aidangomez and @cohere for this amazing breakthrough! On the side, our Gemma IT team also pushed our model thanks to the feedback from the open community. Great day for open models! https://t.co/FkqFl4RIK3
Congrats @openai on the new GPT-4 Turbo launch🔥 The model is now in the Arena! Come challenge it with your toughest prompts🧩 https://t.co/J9eq5ECGhD https://t.co/58sX5Jflka
Is this the first open weights model to beat GPT4 not on some "narrow unique task" in benchmarks, but on real world user preference? Damn, just a few weeks ago GPT4 was toppled for the first time from the top and now is beaten by open weights models 😮 Go @cohere ! https://t.co/boJK1KSzAf
Hearing more and more that Claude 3 Opus is outperforming GPT-4 for most tasks & that GPT-4 performance has been degrading. Lots of devs switching. Common themes: Claude answers more questions (less "I can't answer that") Claude is better at code-gen https://t.co/8pXU7GrIZo
Hearing more and more that Claude 3 Opus is outperforming GPT-4 for most tasks & that GPT-4 performance has been degrading. Lots of devs switching. Common themes: Claude answers more questions. (less "I can't answer that") Claude is better at code-gen https://t.co/8pXU7GrIZo
Exploring robust evaluation methods for RAG workflows, @aparnadhinak looks at the performance of GPT-4, Claude 2.1, and Claude 3.0 Opus, and zooms in on their performance around the generation part of the pipeline. https://t.co/8xSKnYNsvZ
LangSmith Evaluations With the rapid pace of AI, developers are often faced with a paradox of choice: how to choose the right prompt, how to trade-off LLM quality vs cost? Evaluations can accelerate development with structured process for making these decisions. But, we've… https://t.co/FfSNqPUwdV
Our latest study measures how persuasive language models like Claude are compared to humans. We find a general scaling trend: newer models tend to be more persuasive, with Claude 3 Opus generating arguments that don't differ statistically from human-written ones. https://t.co/ftKiWEVe4b
Now that we have about two dozen LLMs in the market, here are the dimensions that matter when it comes to using them. Reasoning - Claude 3 Opus beats everything out Code - GPT-4 is still king here Cost - Claude Haiku is your best bet Latency - Claude or a local open-source…
If GPT-5 is substantially better than - for example - Claude 3, how will one be able to tell.. This will get harder and harder to distinguish for "normal folks".
Cohere beating Meta and Mistral to GPT-4 performance with an open weights model was not in my LLM bingo card - huge congrats to the team for making this tech widely accessible 🔥! https://t.co/yU7t2v0wlF
If you didn’t follow all, the situation has dramatically changed on the arena of LLMs recently: - @AnthropicAI’s Claude 3 opus is now the undefeated winner of all closed-source models (just look at this win-rate line!) - @cohere Command R+ is the new super strong leader of… https://t.co/rGkMsnuifw
🤖 Excited that Command R+ is the top open-weights model on Chatbot Arena! 🛠️🗺️ This doesn't even assess RAG, tool use, and multilingual capabilities where ⌘R+ does well. 🛝You can try out ⌘R+ on the playground (https://t.co/zaofovCC1K) or in the🤗 Space… https://t.co/bZ0MXweu8i
Cohere beating Meta and Mistral to GPT-4 performance with an open weights model was not in my LLM bingo - huge congrats to the team for making this tech widely accessible 🔥! https://t.co/yU7t2v0wlF
This is legitimately historic for AI: We now have an open model that outperforms the original GPT-4, both 0314 and 0613. A phenomenal achievement from @cohere https://t.co/VfmiLkja6w
GPT-4 vs Claude 3 Opus reasoning ability: Without running the prompt below —which model do you think will do better, GPT-4 or Claude Opus? https://t.co/XrOkHLgma7
There are 𝐭𝐰𝐨 benchmarks that I trust for LLMs: - Your own evals 🔍 - Chatbot Arena 🤖 (users do a blind A/B test) Amazing to see that Command R+ from @cohere is the first open-weights model outperforming GPT-4. And this is not yet testing RAG & tool use. https://t.co/aUfHCcUznr
🚀wow! congrats @cohere!! Command R+ by @cohere has surged to 6th place, matching GPT-4-0314 with over 13K human votes! Huge congrats to @cohere for leading the pack with the best open model https://t.co/f1ZW3vpHg4 #models #llms #gpus #nvidia 4090 https://t.co/jhEVCPYW4Z
Feel like Claude is now better than chatGPT Higher fidelity responses esp as a brainstorming partner Anyone else seeing similar? Or have something you feel is even better?
Feel like Claude is now better than chatGPT Better, more high fidelity responses esp as a brainstorming partner Anyone else seeing similar? Or have something you feel is even better?
Did you know that Command R+ is on the Open LLM Leaderboard? It's notably got very good scores on MMLU and GSM8K! Congrats @upstage on the cool model :) https://t.co/BcMLOEjLxn
Congrats to the team for building the best open weights model ❤️ Plus these benchmarks don't even measure RAG & Tools performance -- where Command R/R+ shine. Excited about what's coming next. https://t.co/ekL0dgvyyk
Exciting news - the latest Arena result are out! @cohere's Command R+ has climbed to the 6th spot, matching GPT-4-0314 level by 13K+ human votes! It's undoubtedly the **best** open model on the leaderboard now🔥 Big congrats to @cohere's incredible work & valuable contribution… https://t.co/5PzpPolC9F
Just after a few tests I get the impression that when it comes to writing creative code Claude Opus beats GPT-4 by lengths without even trying too hard. It only gets ruined by @AnthropicAI's content filtering policy which seems to be operated by coin flips.
its unbelievable how bad gpt4 is right now holy shit. Just tried something for a client that gpt4 failed miserably at and both @AnthropicAI claude haiku and @cohere r+ worked perfectly for. also the cohere playground is stunning weoow
Claude 3 Opus feels like the first model I can really hand off tasks to without writing a really detailed spec. GPT-4 was always quite capable but even for simple tasks, you really needed to poke and prod it. Not so with Claude.
" CLAUDE -3-OPUS significantly outperforms all closed-source LLMs, while the open-source M IXTRAL is on par with GPT-3.5-TURBO." Paper - https://t.co/fTFIP6frYf https://t.co/l3XPB4nrQM
Claude 3 Opus Destroys Other Models at long-context text Summarization 🔥 📌 This Princeton University paper found that Opus seems to be almost twice as good compared to the second best model (GPT-4 Turbo) at book or long-context summarization. It's much more faithful and… https://t.co/LMnfKy6ZDl
OpenAI really needs to drop a haiku or sonnet competitor The tools api, json mode, community libs and overall dev experience for OpenAI is so much better than Claude atm But it makes 0 sense to use gpt4 for anything right now, it’s way too slow and expensive for most use cases